Gsus4@mander.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1年前Justice Department considering push for historic break up of Google after landmark antitrust ruling: reportnypost.comexternal-linkmessage-square244fedilinkarrow-up11.25Kcross-posted to: brainworms@lemm.ee
arrow-up11.25Kexternal-linkJustice Department considering push for historic break up of Google after landmark antitrust ruling: reportnypost.comGsus4@mander.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1年前message-square244fedilinkcross-posted to: brainworms@lemm.ee
minus-squareMigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30·1年前What about Microsoft and Facebook?
minus-squareandroogee (they/she)@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32·edit-21年前How do the people who make this comment every single time something like this happens, expect change when no one’s allowed to be first?
minus-squareAJ1@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·1年前Microsoft already lost an anti-trust suit in 2001. It’s in the article if you care to read it.
minus-squaretrafficnab@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1年前We already had first Microsoft anti-trust suit, but what about second Microsoft anti-trust suit?
minus-squareSpaceinv8er@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1年前No one reads the articles man. I won’t lie, I’m guilty of it, but it’s mainly cuz Im lazy and go to the comments hoping someone will give a synopsis.
minus-squareSnapz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1年前“They said smugly without an ounce of depth in their argument.”
What about Microsoft and Facebook?
How do the people who make this comment every single time something like this happens, expect change when no one’s allowed to be first?
Microsoft already lost an anti-trust suit in 2001. It’s in the article if you care to read it.
We already had first Microsoft anti-trust suit, but what about second Microsoft anti-trust suit?
Thanks
No one reads the articles man. I won’t lie, I’m guilty of it, but it’s mainly cuz Im lazy and go to the comments hoping someone will give a synopsis.
“They said smugly without an ounce of depth in their argument.”