Lemmy.one
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Striker@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 years ago

Don't worry. Be happy. 🙃

lemmy.world

message-square
38
fedilink
815

Don't worry. Be happy. 🙃

lemmy.world

Striker@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 years ago
message-square
38
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • diprount_tomato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    103
    ·
    2 years ago

    Love how they always say “the experts” but never mention what fucking experts they are.

    Give me some names instead of just saying “some expert said it”

    • thatsTheCatch@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      2 years ago

      To be fair, they usually say which experts in the article. Just nobody reads the articles 🙈

    • Metal Zealot@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 years ago

      The “Experts” are flying all over the world in their private jets, emitting more pollution than I do in a year

      • ubermeisters@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        deleted by creator

        • Metal Zealot@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 years ago

          Cuz scientists are immune to moral corruption? Anyone can be bought, man

          • Yendor@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 years ago

            The whole point of the scientific method is that it’s self-correcting. Corrupting one scientist doesn’t matter because the scientific consensus will show that they’re wrong.

            But corrupt one (or a few) politicians and you can get laws changed for your benefit.

      • spfhaar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        How and why? They are usually professors who regret not taking a well-paying job from some company.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Greta Thunberg probably does too, with all the places she speaks and demonstrates at. I’m not going to take issue with it though because her whole thing is advocacy and protest. Just the same, I’m not going to take issue with scientists going to conferences, where they discuss the latest climate science and green technologies and projections, and issue joint statements calling for changes.

        • kingdel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 years ago

          She sails: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transatlantic_Voyages_of_Greta_Thunberg

        • explodicle@local106.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago
          1. Mr. Gotcha

          2. These aren’t the scientists telling you that you’ll just get used to the heat.

          • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            This isn’t meant to be a gotcha. And the experts are certainly scientists of some kind, or in medicine. The article itself clearly isn’t, and if they’re being genuine it was in very poor taste. The headline should’ve been about ways to cope with the heat, not about how we’re about to adapt to heat. The latter has unsaid connotations.

            My point is that you shouldn’t discount the scientific experts based on air travel. The other “experts” can go fuck themselves though

    • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s a catch-all term from professional to nutcase lol.

    • buckykat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s always some think tank ghoul

  • AzPsycho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I have lived in the desert my whole life. So I guess I’m an expert now. I can tell you that it’s hot as fuck and it can still kill me. No amount of planned “exposure” is going to prevent dehydration or heat exhaustion.

    • VicFic!@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Lack of humidity in the air is a big problem, but op does have a point. As a person living near the equator I’m surprised by how many people are intolerant to temperatures which I find comfortable.

      • HandwovenConsensus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’ve heard too much humidity is a bigger problem. Keeps your body from being able to cool itself down with sweat, making you likely to overheat. With desert heat you’re probably fine if you have water and shelter from the sun.

        • WackyTabbacy42069@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Large swaths of the earth will be made inhospitable to humans because of a deadly mix of high humidity and heat. Our society needs to to accommodate this and develop shelters, otherwise our streets will be littered with the bodies of homeless and working poor who were forced to brave the outside.

        • Pipoca@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Mostly.

          What really matters for hyperthermia is the “wet bulb” temperature. Basically, the temperature you get when you wrap a thermometer with a wet cloth, simulating the cooling you get from sweat.

          120° F with 5% relative humidity is a wet bulb temperature of about 69°.

  • gandalf_der_12te@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yeah actually it’s not even so much about the humans. Humans can deal with changing temperatures. Plants (that we eat) cannot.

    • bjg13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 years ago

      Wet bulb temp of 95° F is the start of deadly heat for humans. That’d be about 109° @ 50% humidity, or 130° with dry air. I’d say it’ll be a crap shoot next year, when El Nino is in full swing, whether we see more crop or human death from the heat. But for a glorious moment, we created a lot of value for the shareholders…

      THIS IS FINE!

      • LogLurker @mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        A recent study suggested that the safe upper limit in wet bulb conditions might be closer to 88F. Link to an article discussing the research

        • bjg13@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          Wow. Trouble. And in our road.

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Can I ask where you learned that info? I’ve never heard it put that way.

        • PaleRider@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          Well a quick search found this…

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wet-bulb_temperature

          Basically the air is warmer and wetter so the human body cannot shed heat.

          • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            Never read the wiki before. Thanks. Terrifying

          • Ferris@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            dis is how a sauna works.

        • bjg13@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/07/10/1028172/climate-change-human-body-extreme-heat-survival/

          • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Can we commodify this?

  • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 years ago

    As somebody who goes through the extremely hot August summer heat where I live I will tell you that no you don’t get used to the heat if you’re exposed to too much heat you’ll develop heat exhaustion, and if you keep going you’ll get heat stroke which can kill you.

    What I’m wondering though is did Washington compost actually say this, or was it just made for the meme? Honestly if they did I would not be surprised in the slightest.

    • explodicle@local106.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-solutions/2023/07/29/how-to-become-heat-tolerant/

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is true, to a degree. People that live in hot climates slowly become more tolerant to heat in general. This isn’t true in all cases, not is it true past a certain temperature. For instance, once you surpass the wet bulb temperature, it’s not going to matter how tolerant you’ve become to heat, yo’re probably going to end up with heat exhaustion and/or heat stroke.

  • SeriousNick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    Actually true. I’d been wearing an orthopedical corset for a good chunk of my life, now I’m really tolerant to heat, like others may be literally dying while I would be alright.

  • thantik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is the “All Lives Matter” of Climate change.

  • Qkall@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    @lowqualityfacts@mstdn.social

    this is the source and fun to follow :)

  • Sir_Simon_Spamalot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    “experts”

  • Lexi Sneptaur@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s a climate solution because using your A/C less uses less energy

    • ThenThreeMore@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Actually using your AC is one thing, incorrectly disposing of it and the gases therein is another thing all together. A ton of the refrigerating gasses in an AC (or your fridge or freezer) is equivalent of up to 22,800 tons of CO2.

      https://www.gov.uk/guidance/calculate-the-carbon-dioxide-equivalent-quantity-of-an-f-gas

      • Lexi Sneptaur@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Interesting! I’ve never thrown one away and always sold it to the next person so I never looked into this

        • ThenThreeMore@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          It applies to fridges and freezers too. As long as the gasses are disposed of properly it’s fine though.

Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world

lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful

Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

…


2. No Illegal Content

Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

…


3. No Spam

Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

…


4. No Porn/Explicit

Content


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

…


5. No Enciting Harassment,

Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

…


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

…

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 27 users / day
  • 48 users / week
  • 94 users / month
  • 22.2K users / 6 months
  • 200 local subscribers
  • 33.6K subscribers
  • 15.7K Posts
  • 338K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Aer@lemmy.world
  • Striker@lemmy.world
  • WiildFiire@lemmy.world
  • Decoy321@lemmy.world
  • Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
  • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
  • The Picard Maneuver@startrek.website
  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
  • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.7
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org