• Bloxlord@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 年前

    Look through the thread and you will see people showing their work and coming up with similar numbers. 40% was a rough estimate off the top of my head. Figures from a recent paystub of mine: gross income of $2700.80, net income of $1774.41. My deductions are more than just taxes, but regardless that is an effective reduction in pay of %35.31. This is a real life figure that the others may be similarly subjected to, as opposed to the numbers you get out of a calculator.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 年前

      I’d be glad if rich people paid 40% tax.

      But it is closer to 4%, while they could easily pay 95%.

      Taxes are not the problem. They are necessary for a functioning society. And if other people avoid paying taxes, that means YOU will have to pay more. Because the money will have to come from somewhere.

      I’d gladly pay 90% taxes if it meant the rest of my expenses were provided by the government.

      • dorron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 年前

        In the UK if you earn over £100k you effectively get taxed 60% (using PAYE)

        I’d happily pay 75% if it meant public services were actually effective, but we have the double whammy of high taxation and crumbling services - that’s what over a decade of conservative rule does… Here’s to the next 4 years!

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 年前

      Look through the thread and you will see people showing their work and coming up with similar numbers.

      I’ve not seen anyone so far in this thread quoting 40% taxes. Looking at

      I just pulled my paystub (single income household) and I’m at 37% of income going to taxes and full benefits (including 7% to my 401k) covering my whole family while not making much more than the OP