Varven@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 1 年前Pls someone make this realitylemmy.worldimagemessage-square253fedilinkarrow-up11.76K
arrow-up11.76KimagePls someone make this realitylemmy.worldVarven@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 1 年前message-square253fedilink
minus-squarePugJesus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 年前We generally say ‘Antiquity’ and ‘Late Antiquity’ anymore.
minus-squareTrainguyrom@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·edit-21 年前Ooh present-tense anymore! Really don’t see that very often, but it’s got a nice ring to it Edit: it’s a positive anymore not present-tense. Thank you @oktux@lemm.ee!
minus-squareHadriscus@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-21 年前Can you explain please ? I don’t understand their sentence as it is. What’s surprising to me isn’t the present tense, it’s the fact that it isn’t negative.
minus-squareoktux@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 年前It sounds odd to me too, but I found a wiki article on it: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_anymore
We generally say ‘Antiquity’ and ‘Late Antiquity’ anymore.
Ooh present-tense anymore! Really don’t see that very often, but it’s got a nice ring to it
Edit: it’s a positive anymore not present-tense. Thank you @oktux@lemm.ee!
Can you explain please ? I don’t understand their sentence as it is. What’s surprising to me isn’t the present tense, it’s the fact that it isn’t negative.
It sounds odd to me too, but I found a wiki article on it: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_anymore
Thanks, TIL I learned