minnix@lemux.minnix.dev to Philosophy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoNoam Chomsky, 95, ‘no longer able to talk’ as intellectual’s ‘health deteriorates’www.independent.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square75fedilinkarrow-up1436cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
arrow-up1436external-linkNoam Chomsky, 95, ‘no longer able to talk’ as intellectual’s ‘health deteriorates’www.independent.co.ukminnix@lemux.minnix.dev to Philosophy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square75fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
minus-squarepostmateDumbass@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoYour position is: We don’t know what it is, but AI certainly won’t have it? Does not seem rigorous.
minus-squareSweetpeaches69@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-21 year agoLol. Lmao even. Imagine thinking so rigidly. Plenty of things were known of before it was known how exactly they work. My position is: We know something is causing this, but our understanding of it is currently infantile.
Your position is:
We don’t know what it is, but AI certainly won’t have it?
Does not seem rigorous.
Lol. Lmao even.
Imagine thinking so rigidly. Plenty of things were known of before it was known how exactly they work. My position is:
We know something is causing this, but our understanding of it is currently infantile.
QED