testeronious@lemmy.world to

Climate@slrpnk.net · 2 years ago

Taking CO2 out of the air would be an absurdly expensive way to fight climate change

www.theverge.com

303

Taking CO2 out of the air would be an absurdly expensive way to fight climate change

www.theverge.com

testeronious@lemmy.world to

Climate@slrpnk.net · 2 years ago

Taking CO2 out of the air would be an absurdly expensive way to fight climate change

www.theverge.com

It could cost the US $100 billion a year.

Chat

Gigan@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
arrow-up
17·
2 years ago
It also doesn’t work.

Climate@slrpnk.net

climate@slrpnk.net

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !climate@slrpnk.net

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

493 users / day
1.57K users / week
3.06K users / month
7.27K users / 6 months
43 local subscribers
8.6K subscribers
13K Posts
47.8K Comments
Modlog

mods:
silence7@slrpnk.net