It’s not surprising that an encyclopedia maintained by volunteers is heavily biased when the only people with sufficient time and money to volunteer are terminally-online basement-dwellers.
I need to stress that the “reliable sources” used for citations in Wikipedia are billionaire owned rags. In the case of articles about the DPRK, they’re mostly State Department publications.
It’s not surprising that an encyclopedia maintained by volunteers is heavily biased when the only people with sufficient time and money to volunteer are terminally-online basement-dwellers.
This (at times insufferable) article does a good job of describing the effort it takes to combat misinformation on Wikipedia
I need to stress that the “reliable sources” used for citations in Wikipedia are billionaire owned rags. In the case of articles about the DPRK, they’re mostly State Department publications.