I don’t know much about designing a phone motherboard but it’s my understanding that it’s not price of the materials for the traces themselves that adds cost but actually integrating it with the design as a whole. Smartphone PCBs are crazy complex so if not including 3.0 speeds meant the board was easier to design for them and thus cheaper then that’s fine for me. Ultimately they have made the phone cheaper at launch than last gen so they have managed to do that somehow.
I’m a photographer and I don’t find SD card slow for photos and video storage/transfer at all. Obviously they aren’t great for running applications off of but they work very well for transfering files.
Obviously, I can’t seem to convince you that the other benefits fairphone bring outway the fact that they don’t offer usb 3.0 speeds. It is a bummer and weird they had it on the last gen but I would give it up in a heart beat to be able to replace the battery, screen, usb-c port, etc. of my own device on my own with very little hassle. We can agree to disagree on this one
To start with, China bad.
However, if they are willing to inject money into European companies and their influence on those companies is kept in check meaning they are never allowed to solely control those companies, then I think that’s fine. They make some money and EU companies get some investment that they hopefully use to be more competitive. Maybe there is information I don’t know but sounds like how Pirelli is managing it is good. In the case of Pirelli, going further would just be placating the US which we need to stop doing all the time in my view.
This should not be allowed for all companies (military, IT security, other sensitive stuff…) and I think the unbalanced competitive landscape in China itself makes things unfair too. But it’s not something the EU can practically change. We don’t have many carrots/sticks we can use to stop dumping their products and stealing IP.