True, in principle they’d want infinite revenue and zero cost. Publicly traded companies have a fiduciary duty to chase that outcome.
Incidentally, that is how I behave towards my employer, since it is in my financial interest to do as little as I can get away with.
Just when it was going so well!
Combined with the recent paper about CO2 concentrations being too high to exist in 50 years I’d say party’s over.
Oh well, my retirement plan was dying anyway.
I wonder if that’s legal. I guess IMDb is just one of the oily black tentacles of the entity that owns everything?
Only a Sith!
I must confess, this sparked a laugh
This pointiness, it’s nature’s gaff
Give me a siiiiign
Fool me baby one more time
Uncovered by simply uncovering your eyes.
Summer in Europe: IT ALWAYS COMES BACK. WITH A VENGEANCE!
We’re all mentally challenged anyway, just open your rat hole to whatever song your thinker dreams up.
Business idiots will assume that once their workforce is largely replaced by AI and their company depends on it, AI vendors will make their services cheaper. When have we ever seen SaaS get cheaper over time? Why wouldn’t Anthropic or OpenAI squeeze anyone dumb enough to bet their company on it for everything they’ve got? Cost may drastically drop, although I doubt it, but those margins are for Dario and Sam and the shareholders, not the suckers.
Always has been. But for the sake of argument let’s say it’ll work, this whole AI schtick. As a business you’re then opening yourself up to the same squeeze as SaaS does, except instead of tools being held hostage to a Silicon Valley behemoth, it’s the core of your company.
Shit deal if you ask me.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-026-01918-5