And if you were to say, for example, that pasta with tomato sauce is an Italian dish, I’d argue it’s not, as pasta was eaten across the whole Europe, and likely first added tomato happened in Britain.

Bolognese sauce with pasta on the other hand would definitely be Italian dish. Do you see the distinction?

Fair.

Polish rosół is much more similar to French consomme than to ramen though. The stretch to ramen would be rather significant.

I mean even scrambled eggs is too much for any Italian hotel or breakfast restaurant I’ve been to. Like literally as if they made it mediocre on purpose.

They make good meat dishes (roasts, meat pies), but then they pair them with the most uninspiring sides…

I mean… British were always shafted by their nobility. The land wasn’t known for fruits or sweet veggies, the rent in UK paid to the landlord was relatively high, so most peasants ate pickles, chutneys or different mushed veggies as sides.

But has British food historically been good? No, it has not.

Oh boy. You should Google that, because you couldn’t be more wrong.

Edit:

Example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Forme_of_Cury XIV century cookbook. Damn, oldest known recipe for macaroni and cheese comes from it.

XIV - XV century whole Europe was jelly for English cuisine.

XVI you were the capital of pastries and sweets.

Well, turns out that for the past few hundred years men cooks were only the talented ones or those that had interest, while for women it was not a choice.

Out of the food you mentioned only Beef Wellington and English Breakfast/Ulster Fry/ are uniquely British.

Everything else is either not a dish (fried sausage and potatoes definitely is not a dish you philistine :P) or not distinct enough.

Pork pies, fish and chips, roast, shepherds pie - it is eaten in Britain, but is not unique to them, as was historically eaten across the whole Europe (I mean it is fish and chips, it didn’t need “inventing”).

Yeah, no, Italians can’t make breakfast for shit.

Coffee and a cake does not breakfast make.

A debugger will always interfere with the processes you are looking at, hence making debugging of multithreading-related errors a game of whack-a-mole.

It’s a very pleasant debugging experience when you can easily switch threads, have them log what happened first, check the variables in the thread at the moment in time it was hit (vs now), etc. etc.

This and an easy way to attach a line-by-line debugger and I’m golden.

I believe that is a vast minority of developments. And tbh multithreading debugging is a breeze in C# on Rider (except race conditions, those will always be tricky, but also easily identifiable).

Huh? That is the literal opposite of what I said. Like, diametrically opposite.

The system summarizes and hashes docs. The model can only answer from those summaries in that mode. There’s no semantic retrieval step.

No, that’s exactly what you wrote.

Now, with this change

SUMM -> human reviews

That would be fixed, but will work only for small KBs, as otherwise the summary would be exhaustive.

Case in point: assume a Person model with 3-7 facts per Person. Assume small 3000 size set of Persons. How would the SUMM of work? Do you expect a human to verify that SUMM? How are you going to converse with your system to get the data from that KB Person set? Because to me that sounds like case C, only works for small KBs.

Again: the proposition is not “the model will never hallucinate.”. It’s “it can’t silently propagate hallucinations without a human explicitly allowing it to, and when it does, you trace it back to source version”.

Fair. Except that you are still left with the original problem of you don’t know WHEN the information is incorrect if you missed it at SUMM time.

The system summarizes and hashes docs. The model can only answer from those summaries in that mode

Oh boy. So hallucination will occur here, and all further retrievals will be deterministically poisoned?

So… Rag with extra steps and rag summarization? What about facts that are not rag retrieval?

A very tailored to llms strengths benchmark calls you a liar.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/articles/gemini-3-flash-everything-you-need-to-know (A month ago the hallucination rate was ~50-70%)

I want to believe you, but that would mean you solved hallucination.

Either:

A) you’re lying

B) you’re wrong

C) KB is very small

thorn only sometimes?

Because that person is young and experimenting with different shits.

Source: I remember when I was young and my behaviour then.

Nice scientific approach to proving that German sounds angry.

He’s also wrong by saying that people think German is warlike and ugly because of Hitler. German neighbours (e.g. Poles) have written sources hundred years old proving him wrong (at least 1890-ish)

Edit: even older lol, Wincenty Kadłubek was implying that in ~1200

Besides that I hate that old “German sounds angry” shit

I mean:

1. It’s funny because it’s true
2. All non-Germany speaking countries have at least 1 joke, where the point is with German language you just don’t know if it’s a new vacuum cleaner brand name, or a declaration of war.

In the early 2010s there was a trend to throw in obfuscation into the minis.