Saapas

Did you just get everything delivered or what’s the deal?

“Wow they’re really religious”

Alright

Definitely most Europeans and Westerners, but I meant most people. But I don’t think there’s any actual numbers or that so not much sense to get into an argument about it

I did say “most” in the first comment

The whole point was if they’re going to be viewed worse than Nazi Germany. Do you feel like there’s a point where the empire is gone and people will switch to thinking of it worse than Nazi Germany?

It hasn’t happened yet and I don’t see it happening tbh.

I’m not sure what that matters for the topic at hand.

British Empire is dead and buried but most wouldn’t consider them worse than Nazi Germany

I seriously doubt that unless they ramp up their shit a lot

I keep linking…?

An atypical example of something is still a “true” example of the thing, especially given that the very term derives its origin from Stonehenge itself.

I think the article is a bit confused in both defining the “henge” and saying if it is a henge or not. It sets a definition that Stonehenge doesn’t follow, calls it “atypical”, says it’s not “true” henge (whatever that means) and so on. And all of those seem to be not directly sourced. One of the sources makes the confusion even worse:

Ironically, even though Stonehenge has an earthwork circle around it (the earliest phase of the monument), it isn’t officially a ‘proper’ henge, as the main ditch is external to the main bank. It has to make do with being a ‘proto-henge’.

I guess in this use it a “proper” (“true”?) henge is a henge and “proto-henge” is not a henge but a thing that precedes them. That’d explain some of the confusion. Could also be that “proto-henge” is counted as a form of a henge, but I’m not sure. Other examples seem to consider it preceding actual henges.

It would help if there was one definition for henge but there seems to be some that define it like in the article, with the ditch inside and others that just include a ditch.

especially given that the very term derives its origin from Stonehenge itself.

Terms can change over time, it could be the definiton of “henge” has changed.

The video was so strange. So many people just stood there filming. I thought it was from some movie or just fake.

Smart move from them though. People are going to be buying oil no matter what, but no need to keep yourself reliant on it

Oh damn you had already mentioned this!

Something I learned from QI

Stonehenge is not a true henge, as its ditch runs outside its bank, although there is a small extant external bank as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henge

Random Lemmy comments, the first line of defence for the US lol

You’re not doing anything for the people by getting upset at some internet rando. Just saying.

You’re out here getting upset over a joke. It’s not like either of us is doing anything productive lol

Killing or especially capturing the top of civilian leader is obviously going to throw a wrench into the situation by confusing things and helping to worsen the morale of the people fighting. I’m not sure why you guys are acting like that’s not the case. Seems a bit silly tbh.

Just because Russia didn’t successfully pull it off doesn’t mean it wouldn’t have helped them. What next, the truck line towards Kyiv, that was some 4d chess too? lol

I had no idea it was sarcasm.

There’s actual shit happening in the world and you’re out here getting upset over a simple joke. Priorities.

Thanks