That’s haram

Ahh yes, frogs, the perfect species

From what I heard, she turned her life around. Watched first minute of this interview uploaded 4 days ago, seems perfectly normal: https://youtu.be/Hk2m52UYuXA

Rocket boy low key sounds badass

Made me remember this song tho: https://youtu.be/FBnAZnfNB6U

For some of us out of loop - what is deadnaming?

And bunch of other sacrifices. One of the points was also about everyone living in a city close by. The study is not applicable to real life, it’s utopia scenario. One of the biggest problems isn’t even resources, but co2 production.

High humidity tends to ruin a lot of houses/construction materials over time, but you’ll likely first notice random spores

But if that isn’t a metaphor, then you’re literally asking her to be your insect. I mean, I don’t judge fetishes, but borderline feels rude.

Reminded me of this: https://xkcd.com/3102/

I’m here still using jQuery and php+sockets for nearly all my needs. Only once in my life I actually needed node

In parallel Israel has never tested a nuclear bomb

Not officially

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vela_incident

https://i.imgur.com/w9w0Acb.jpeg

Imagine doing math with strings and then blaming the language not yourself

Introducing: Chlorone gas with a chance of hydrogen

I both loved and hated Interstellar. Really loved the storytelling and visuals, really hated how sci-fi/magical it got towards the end

I remember thinking at the end “wait, what was the entire point of this?”

This is the first time I heard of this and made me really curious. I tried my best to find any proof, confirmations or fact checking sites backing up this claim, but nada. Either the dude has succesfully paid literally everyone to lie, or, sometimes the truth sounds worse than a lie and our cognitive function really wants approvals for that.

If you have something solid, please send it to me, wish I could use this argument, but at this point I’d feel like yellow press

Are all molecules “wet” with air, then?

If we come up with a definition for this process, then yes, why not.

A “wet” towel will feel damp and watery to a person picking it up in a way almost indistinguishable from water itself, and this is enough to say that both are wet.

But you see, if I ask you for a wet towel, it will sound normal. If I’d ask you for wet water, I’d look mentally questionable

Well fire has a specific definition of something being oxidized, so does being wet.

Which is still a definition for a state (or process/chemical reaction). Something that causes the state/reaction (like oxygen, salt and water on metal) cannot be a state in itself, therefore the logic tells me water in itself cannot be wet as it’s not reacting with something else

Saying water is wet because it touches water sounds like “Fire is on fire because it touches fire”. It just sounds fundamentally illogical as you’re talking about a state of matter, not the matter itself.

I’m not a scientist, just throwing in my view on this

Removed by mod