It depends on how Intel is rescued: whether the government nationalizes it completely to become a state-owned company, partial rescue of the company to structure it, conventional rescue, or whether it is placed under federal guardianship for a time and then privatized.

In short, yes, but in certain scenarios.

Arguments in favor of rescuing Intel:

• It is a crucial sector; if a company goes bankrupt, it is difficult to recover for several years, because it is usually difficult for a new company if it does not have sufficient resources and/or support.
• If Intel declares bankruptcy, it would leave AMD with a monopoly on x64 because, without a direct rival to compete with, the price of CPUs is likely to increase and, as a result, the price of PCs would also increase.
• By rescuing Intel, the company can better plan its strategies and make long-term plans without pressure from shareholders to make a profit.
• It would preserve many people’s jobs, keeping unemployment low and without affecting people’s finances.
• Continue to maintain technological sovereignty in the country without the risk of another foreign company buying Intel’s technology.

I wonder if the government will bail out Intel and if it will do so either by paying off its debts or if it will become government property for a while.

In the short term I don’t think so, in the medium term it depends and in the long term it is possible.

I wonder who will win this nuclear fusion race: the United States, Europe, or China?

I would like to see AI tested in the future with certification exams like the CFA Exam, CPA Exam, or university entrance exams like the GaoKao.

I prefer the sphere, than an anime girl

I say Firefox should switch to a more permissive license like BSD, Apache or MIT.

You could use CC BY 4.0 as a first option or the various options offered by Creative Commons, but you could also use the FreeBSD Documentation License, GDFL, or Free Art License.

But if you want it to be in the public domain, you can use CC0 or a license equivalent to the public domain.

What license will the content of Central Hub be under?

Oracle NoSQL Database is released under the CDDL or Apache license

Java being bought by JetBrains and ending up merging Java and Kotlin

The rest in the trash

It was a slow growth for Windows 11

Could these be the first signs of an emergent phenomenon in LLMs? If so, will companies and governments try to prevent it from happening, or will they let it unfold freely?

Yes, this is a possible way to eliminate OpenAI’s rivals and make AI solely in the hands of corporations. It would only benefit in the short term, but be detrimental in the long term.

Another option is that OpenAI has more power and support from large companies, so such a trial would consume more resources and time than what could happen with Midjourney.

Why was Midjourney sued and not OpenAI?

Exactly, the environment changes and we must adapt to face the new changes.

The problem is that misinformation from both Pro-AI and Anti-AI groups makes it harder to obtain solid data.

And where is Jeff Bezos with his briefcase full of bills?

CPAC licks the great leader

The worst thing is that science is produced in Israel

It’s more complicated, because that conflicts with international treaties.