Another quack cure from the early / mid 1900’s. You can find them still in antique markets. It seems to be a UV light wand. UV light is harmful to eyes and can be carcinogenic, causing skin cancers. There are a few skin conditions that spot UV is used to treat today, but most of this ad is harmful quackery!

The ailments the wand claims to cure:

  • Asthma
  • Boils
  • Blackheads
  • Catarrh
  • Colds
  • Eczema
  • Failing Hair
  • Hayfever
  • Headaches
  • Insomnia
  • Lumbago
  • Nervousness
  • Neuralgia
  • Paralysis
  • Pimples
  • Rheumatism
  • Skin Diseases
  • Sore Throat
  • Other ailments
    • EnmebaraGuesser@piefed.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Those indoor tanners we have today are not great for people either! It’s a tradeoff, it gives a tan, but also skin damage and premature aging.

      Exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) [ … from … ] indoor tanning using tanning devices, is known to be a major cause of the three main types of skin cancer: …

      The age at which someone begins indoor tanning has a known impact on the future risk of developing cancers. A 2012 analysis of epidemiological studies found a 20% increase in the risk of melanoma (a relative risk of 1.20) among those who had ever used a tanning device compared to those who had not, and a 59% percent increase (a relative risk of 1.59) among those who had used one before age 35.

        • EnmebaraGuesser@piefed.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Haha thanks. The late 1800’s and early 1900’s is so fascinating to me. In some ways it’s all very familiar, it’s not like the year 700 where we can’t even understand the language. But at the same time, so much of it feels just… weird.

          • verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            I have an interest in the early post-Roman era in Western Europe and sometimes, when I’m reading monastic records (translated), I get a physical rush, because we are them and they are us. Middle English is not so difficult to understand in context, I mean, if you know you’re reading a householder’s account book, for example, you can piece it together and get a rush. It was an age of faith and the beginning of soaring structures, like basilicas that the ordinary people put their whole hearts into with every stone.

            • EnmebaraGuesser@piefed.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              IKWYM about that kinda rush. I’ve read some very old things from 2-3500 BCE, translated into English of course from Sumerian or whatever original. It’s weird, in a good way, to read the words of somebody who’s been dead for multiple millennia. Like you said, we are them and they are us. You can see the worst of us and the best of us, in the worst of them and the best of them.

  • TomMasz@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    If RFK Jr. and his MAHA cronies have their way, this will be back on the market before you know it.

  • jdr@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Oh I know Violet Ray. And I wouldn’t trust any of his gizmos.

  • verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Psoriasis and acne, yes, maybe it would be worth the risk, but no $0.05 set of glasses? This made it for so many years without including any info about the spectrum or wavelength of the light? Just make it up! The readers of “Physical Culture” would not respond to a pitch like that?