• almost_genocide@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    I’m not following you. First you said we have to show up in numbers and I told you we do show up in numbers in the primary. Then you said we have to show up in the general election and I pointed out we did. Now you’re saying that’s not good enough. Either you’re moving goalposts or you’re doing a shit job of explaining yourself.

    Spell it out for me plainly. Tell me exactly what we would have had to do since 2008 in order to be represented.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Nah, I’m sick of filling in every possible edge case in your argument. You say you show up, but you’re making a point to point to specific/conditional situations yet ignore the blindingly obvious answers of why you don’t have the representation you want.

      Show up and vote consistently and change can happen. As it is, I tire of listening to people complain about lack of representation when they choose not to vote for a viable candidate in the general when they had the opportunity to do so because they didn’t line up 100%.

      If that’s not clear enough for you, you’re beyond my help.

      • almost_genocide@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        As it is, I tire of listening to people complain about lack of representation when they choose not to vote for a viable candidate in the general when they had the opportunity to do so because they didn’t line up 100%.

        But as we’ve already established, we did vote for a viable candidate in the 2020 general election. Do you think we lined up with Biden 100% back in 2020? It really seems like you’re the one missing the blindingly obvious answer.