• AEMarling@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Does feel like this is a step in the right direction. The wealthy have way too much power, and philanthropy is a part of that. Making nonprofits beholden to the rich is sinister.

  • underline960@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    This pilot offered a glimpse into the model’s potential while operating under many constraints. Within a very tight timeline of approximately six weeks, the FLAC Design Team facilitated channeling unrestricted funds — considered ‘gifts’ or ‘reparations’ — to five diverse groups working at the intersections of gender, environment, and climate justice. These funds, ranging between $20,000 and $30,000 USD, were given with no reporting requirements and allocated based on identified needs and capacities and work already being done in the world.

    This just sounds like a charity with extra steps. (Nothing necessarily wrong with that.)

    • MysteriousSophon21@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      The big difference here is the unrestricted nature and lack of reporting requirements - traditional charity usually comes with tons of strings attached and forces groups to jump through hoops to “prove” they deserve continued support.