"Canadian defense officials have strongly made the case that Ottawa should stick to a plan to buy 88 Lockheed Martin Corp F-35 fighter jets rather than splitting the order, two sources familiar with the matter said on Thursday.

"The review stops short of making a formal recommendation, one of the sources said.

“The final decision rests with the Liberal government of Prime Minister Mark Carney, said the sources, who requested anonymity given the sensitivity of the situation.”

  • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 days ago

    The US cannot be trusted as a defense partner. From parts, to software to delivery. You don’t buy weapons from those who threaten your sovereignty.

    F35s are a trojan horse.

    • breezeblock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      The F35 is simply the best air weapons platform available — that’s why the military wants them. But the whole episode speaks to the need for a native air defense industry. We have ship building.

      The gripen is the only option that comes with technology transfer, so regardless of how many F35 we get, or how inferior the gripen is comparatively, we have to diversify — even if the short maintenance costs are higher.

    • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      It always was, the JSF program onlt looked at Locheed and Boring, entirely glossed over Saab. Fuck Amerika

  • patatas@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 days ago

    The interesting thing here is why these sources were willing to speak about military procurement. Speaking to media about defence stuff seems like it would probably carry stiff penalties - unless of course you were “authorized” (wink, wink) to do so.

    For that reason, I suspect this is an attempt by the Carney government to test the waters, to get a sense of how much blowback a move like this would result in.

    Probably worth a letter and/or phone call to your MP if you’re opposed!

    • Medic8teMe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Here we go again with this bullshit that he is smarter than the rest of us. Shake your head. You’re watching a man elected on the promise to fight fascism capitulating daily.

      It’s not testing blowback when the vast majority of MP’s are not responding to any communication. Not even with a form email, since the election. They are voted in to represent their constituents. Mine isn’t representing me or willing to even speak with me and I have made it very clear my position and desire to speak as have others.

      We get ignored.

      Our government is selling us away to fascists and the vast majority are ok with it because “he knows something we don’t”

  • FlareHeart@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    The idea that the “best” product is one that we have to rely on another country to not only build, but to maintain, fix, update software/firmware…No thank you.

    The Gripens that come with the knowledge transfer (and jobs creation) of building, maintaining, and fixing them ourselves? That’s a way higher value than anyone in government seems to realize.

    Why would we want to rely on the country that has threatened our sovereignty for our fighters?! Is our government really that dumb?

    • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      They are just part of the problem. Rich people who think they know better. Or they just have stocks with locheed and want to pad their bank accounts

  • Reannlegge@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    I sent my do nothing back bencher MP an email about this, even citing the old letter I sent him back in march where he practically said do not worry it will be years before we get them.

    • Medic8teMe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’ve sent so many emails. I just sent another about this and the missile defense system that is supposedly going to shoot mach 25 hypersonic missiles out of the sky.

      My MP is indigenous. Jamie Battiste. Voting for C-5, C-7 and now these I can only assume. Fucking disgraceful. He must have heavy pockets now.

  • Medic8teMe@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    We need to protest and loudly. Our government, elected to fight this shit is rolling over every chance it gets.

    WE DO NOT NEED ANY NEW DEALS WITH THE FASCIST DRUMPHKINS REGIME.

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    Can we maintain them weight shipping them to a foreign country?

    No? Then don’t buy them.

    As the last year has shown we cannot rely on the US being our partner when it inconveniences them or they feel they can extort us.

  • AGM@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    Sad to say this, but we are still very much in the fold of the empire. The US has an explicit strategy of division of labour for conflict with Russia and China, and we are alongside Europe in the division against Russia. Just look at what we are actually doing. Our defense investment isn’t to harden our southern border. It’s to harden our northern border, facing Russia. We, as the public, are being played. US strategy documents last year laid out the need to apply pressure to create urgency among allies to reindustrialize their military industries, spend more on arms, and for those surrounding Russia to step up and shoulder the burden of facing them so the US can focus on China. This year we see the 5% NATO target demanded by the US accepted, a major bump in Canadian defense spending for the arctic (but not to defend against the US), and increased Canada-Europe collaboration on defense industry as NATO now talks about a two-front war with Russia and China. So, our defense officials won’t be evaluating purchases based on conflict against the US. They’ll be evaluating based on our integration with US systems as part of the larger strategic direction.

  • Grabthar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Yeah, no shit we should buy them. We desperately needed to replace the F-18s 10 years ago. Now, we have waffled on this purchase for so long that we are out of time for choosing another vendor. We don’t have a functional air force that can meet our NATO and NORAD committments right now, and it’s not like we can fix that by just going down to Fighters R Us and picking up a few Gripens either. Procurements take years to iron out the details, and years more for the manufacturer to build.

    This is a terrible time to be without a military. Russia has already started acting on its territorial claims, and China is building up to be able to go after theirs. We need a functional airforce now, not in another 5 to 10 years. It has been often suggested that we only take the first batch delivered to use as a stop gap while we shop for something else for the bulk of the fleet, but I really don’t think we’re up for the logistical capacity required to run two different fighters yet. Maybe of the CAF grows considerably, that would be possible. I think purely from an operational standpoint we are stuck with the F-35, so to make it more appealing from a political view, Canada should play hardball with Lockheed-Martin and get the Israeli deal, where they do their own depot-level maintenance and have some parts manufacturing in country.

    • breezeblock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I don’t know that we’re necessarily need to “run” two fighters, but it’s clear that there is no single platform that meets all sovereignty requirements. I don’t know what the split should be, but we can neither have zero air force, nor one that is completely ineffective against 1 of our top 3 threats. Buy some planes that come with technology transfer, and start looking at the next 30 year window.

      Or quickly hop on board one of the Future Combat Air System / Global Combat Air Program.